Quantitatively Visualizing Airborne Disease Transmission Risks of Different Exhalation Activities through CO2 Imaging.

Aerosol transmission has played a leading role in COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is still a poor understanding about how it is transmitted. This work was designed to study the exhaled breath flow dynamics and transmission risks under different exhaling modes. Using an infrared photography device, exhaled flow characteristics of different breathing activities, such as deep breathing, dry coughing, and laughing, together with the roles of mouth and nose were characterized by imaging CO2 flow morphologies. Both mouth and nose played an important role in the disease transmission though in the downward direction for the nose. In contrast to the trajectory commonly modeled, the exhaled airflows appeared with turbulent entrainments and obvious irregular movements, particularly the exhalations involving mouth were directed horizontal and had a higher propagation capacity and transmission risk. While the cumulative risk was high for deep breathing, those transient ones from dry coughing, yawning, and laughing were also shown to be significant. Various protective measures including masks, canteen table shields, and wearable devices were visually demonstrated to be effective for altering the exhaled flow directions. This work is useful to understanding the risk of aerosol infection and guiding the formulation of its prevention and control strategies. Experimental data also provide important information for refining model boundary conditions.

On airborne transmission and control of SARS-Cov-2.

The COVID-19 pandemic is creating a havoc situation across the globe that modern society has ever seen. Despite of their paramount importance, the transmission routes of SARS-Cov-2 still remain debated among various sectors. Evidences compiled here strongly suggest that the COVID-19 could be transmitted via air in inadequately ventilated environments. Existing experimental data showed that coronavirus survival was negatively impacted by ozone, high temperature and low humidity. Here, regression analysis showed that the spread of SARS-Cov-2 was reduced by increasing ambient ozone concentration level from 48.83 to 94.67 µg/m3 (p-value = 0.039) and decreasing relative humidity from 23.33 to 82.67% (p-value = 0.002) and temperature from -13.17 to 19 °C) (p-value = 0.003) observed for Chinese cities during Jan-March 2020. Besides using these environmental implications, social distancing and wearing a mask are strongly encouraged to maximize the fight against the COVID-19 airborne transmission. At no other time than now are the scientists in various disciplines around the world badly needed by the society to collectively confront this disastrous pandemic.

COVID-19 infections among passengers in an inbound flight to Beijing

Objective To understand the epidemiological characteristics and laboratory test results of COVID-19 infections among passengers in an inbound flight to Beijing, and to provide reference for the management of imported COVID-19 cases. Methods Flight information, centralized quarantine sites, transfer vehicle, laboratory test results, clinical progression and outcome and other information of all passengers in an inbound flight to Beijing on August 6, 2021 were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 15 passengers were COVID-19 positive. They were all tested negative for nucleic acid 48 h before boarding. The earliest positive was on the day of entry, and the longest was on the 13th day of entry, with the median of being the 3rd day after entry. There were inconsistent nucleic acid test results of 8 positive passengers reported by two institutions and the CT values were close to cutoff. The initial serum antibody levels were higher than 100（s/co） in 6 positive passengers. Nobody was infected during transportation and quarantine. Conclusions Nucleic acid testing before boarding the flight should be able to identify majority of positive cases. Accordingly, joint screening strategy such as blood serum antibody test for inbound passengers with suspicious preliminary screening results of COVID-19 should be implemented to determine the infection history of the case.

Airborne antibiotic resistome and human health risk in railway stations during COVID-19 pandemic.

Antimicrobial resistance is recognized as one of the greatest public health concerns. It is becoming an increasingly threat during the COVID-19 pandemic due to increasing usage of antimicrobials, such as antibiotics and disinfectants, in healthcare facilities or public spaces. To explore the characteristics of airborne antibiotic resistome in public transport systems, we assessed distribution and health risks of airborne antibiotic resistome and microbiome in railway stations before and after the pandemic outbreak by culture-independent and culture-dependent metagenomic analysis. Results showed that the diversity of airborne antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) decreased following the pandemic, while the relative abundance of core ARGs increased. A total of 159 horizontally acquired ARGs, predominantly confering resistance to macrolides and aminoglycosides, were identified in the airborne bacteria and dust samples. Meanwhile, the abundance of horizontally acquired ARGs hosted by pathogens increased during the pandemic. A bloom of clinically important antibiotic (tigecycline and meropenem) resistant bacteria was found following the pandemic outbreak. 251 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were recovered from 27 metagenomes, and 86 genera and 125 species were classified. Relative abundance of ARG-carrying MAGs, taxonomically assigned to genus of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Staphylococcus, was found increased during the pandemic. Bayesian source tracking estimated that human skin and anthropogenic activities were presumptive resistome sources for the public transit air. Moreover, risk assessment based on resistome and microbiome data revealed elevated airborne health risks during the pandemic.

An ultrasensitive and rapid "sample-to-answer" microsystem for on-site monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols using "in situ" tetra-primer recombinase polymerase amplification.

Airborne transmissibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has highlighted the urgent need for aerosol monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 to prevent sporadic outbreaks of COVID-19. The inadequate sensitivity of conventional methods and the lack of an on-site detection system limited the practical SARS-CoV-2 monitoring of aerosols in public spaces. We have developed a novel SARS-CoV-2-in-aerosol monitoring system (SIAMs) which consists of multiple portable cyclone samplers for collecting aerosols from several venues and a sensitive "sample-to-answer" microsystem employing an integrated cartridge for the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols (iCASA) near the sampling site. By seamlessly combining viral RNA extraction based on a chitosan-modified quartz filter and "in situ" tetra-primer recombinase polymerase amplification (tpRPA) into an integrated microfluidic cartridge, iCASA can provide an ultra-high sensitivity of 20 copies/mL, which is nearly one order of magnitude greater than that of the commercial kit, and a short turnaround time of 25 min. By testing various clinical samples of nasopharyngeal swabs, saliva, and exhaled breath condensates obtained from 23 COVID-19 patients, we demonstrate that the positive rate of our system was 3.3 times higher than those of the conventional method. Combining with multiple portable cyclone samplers, we detected 52.2% (12/23) of the aerosol samples, six times higher than that of the commercial kit, collected from the isolation wards of COVID-19 patients, demonstrating the excellent performance of our system for SARS-CoV-2-in-aerosol monitoring. We envision the broad application of our microsystem in aerosol monitoring for fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.

What were the historical reasons for the resistance to recognizing airborne transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic?

The question of whether SARS-CoV-2 is mainly transmitted by droplets or aerosols has been highly controversial. We sought to explain this controversy through a historical analysis of transmission research in other diseases. For most of human history, the dominant paradigm was that many diseases were carried by the air, often over long distances and in a phantasmagorical way. This miasmatic paradigm was challenged in the mid to late 19th century with the rise of germ theory, and as diseases such as cholera, puerperal fever, and malaria were found to actually transmit in other ways. Motivated by his views on the importance of contact/droplet infection, and the resistance he encountered from the remaining influence of miasma theory, prominent public health official Charles Chapin in 1910 helped initiate a successful paradigm shift, deeming airborne transmission most unlikely. This new paradigm became dominant. However, the lack of understanding of aerosols led to systematic errors in the interpretation of research evidence on transmission pathways. For the next five decades, airborne transmission was considered of negligible or minor importance for all major respiratory diseases, until a demonstration of airborne transmission of tuberculosis (which had been mistakenly thought to be transmitted by droplets) in 1962. The contact/droplet paradigm remained dominant, and only a few diseases were widely accepted as airborne before COVID-19: those that were clearly transmitted to people not in the same room. The acceleration of interdisciplinary research inspired by the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that airborne transmission is a major mode of transmission for this disease, and is likely to be significant for many respiratory infectious diseases.

COVID-19 screening using breath-borne volatile organic compounds.

Rapid screening of COVID-19 is key to controlling the pandemic. However, current nucleic acid amplification involves lengthy procedures in addition to the discomfort of taking throat/nasal swabs. Here we describe potential breath-borne volatile organic compound (VOC) biomarkers together with machine learning that can be used for point-of-care screening of COVID-19. Using a commercial gas chromatograph-ion mobility spectrometer, higher levels of propanol were detected in the exhaled breath of COVID-19 patients (N= 74) and non-COVID-19 respiratory infections (RI) (N= 30) than those of non-COVID-19 controls (NC)/health care workers (HCW) (N= 87), and backgrounds (N= 87). In contrast, breath-borne acetone was found to be significantly lower for COVID-19 patients than other subjects. Twelve key endogenous VOC species using supervised machine learning models (support vector machines, gradient boosting machines (GBMs), and Random Forests) were shown to exhibit strong capabilities in discriminating COVID-19 from (HCW + NC) and RI with a precision ranging from 91% to 100%. GBM and Random Forests models can also discriminate RI patients from healthy subjects with a precision of 100%. In addition, the developed models using breath-borne VOCs could also detect a confirmed COVID-19 patient but with a false negative throat swab polymerase chain reaction test. It takes 10 min to allow an entire breath test to finish, including analysis of the 12 key VOC species. The developed technology provides a novel concept for non-invasive rapid point-of-care-test screening for COVID-19 in various scenarios.

Breath-, air- and surface-borne SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought an unprecedented crisis to the global health sector. When discharging COVID-19 patients in accordance with throat or nasal swab protocols using RT-PCR, the potential risk of reintroducing the infection source to humans and the environment must be resolved. Here, 14 patients including 10 COVID-19 subjects were recruited; exhaled breath condensate (EBC), air samples and surface swabs were collected and analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in four hospitals with applied natural ventilation and disinfection practices in Wuhan. Here we discovered that 22.2% of COVID-19 patients (n = 9), who were ready for hospital discharge based on current guidelines, had SARS-CoV-2 in their exhaled breath (~105 RNA copies/m3). Although fewer surface swabs (3.1%, n = 318) tested positive, medical equipment such as face shield frequently contacted/used by healthcare workers and the work shift floor were contaminated by SARS-CoV-2 (3-8 viruses/cm2). Three of the air samples (n = 44) including those collected using a robot-assisted sampler were detected positive by a digital PCR with a concentration level of 9-219 viruses/m3. RT-PCR diagnosis using throat swab specimens had a failure rate of more than 22% in safely discharging COVID-19 patients who were otherwise still exhaling the SARS-CoV-2 by a rate of estimated ~1400 RNA copies per minute into the air. Direct surface contact might not represent a major transmission route, and lower positive rate of air sample (6.8%) was likely due to natural ventilation (1.6-3.3 m/s) and regular disinfection practices. While there is a critical need for strengthening hospital discharge standards in preventing re-emergence of COVID-19 spread, use of breath sample as a supplement specimen could further guard the hospital discharge to ensure the safety of the public and minimize the pandemic re-emergence risk.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients in Earlier Stages Exhaled Millions of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Per Hour.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients exhaled millions of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA copies per hour, which plays an important role in COVID-19 transmission. Exhaled breath had a higher positive rate (26.9%, n = 52) than surface (5.4%, n = 242) and air (3.8%, n = 26) samples.

How can airborne transmission of COVID-19 indoors be minimised?

During the rapid rise in COVID-19 illnesses and deaths globally, and notwithstanding recommended precautions, questions are voiced about routes of transmission for this pandemic disease. Inhaling small airborne droplets is probable as a third route of infection, in addition to more widely recognized transmission via larger respiratory droplets and direct contact with infected people or contaminated surfaces. While uncertainties remain regarding the relative contributions of the different transmission pathways, we argue that existing evidence is sufficiently strong to warrant engineering controls targeting airborne transmission as part of an overall strategy to limit infection risk indoors. Appropriate building engineering controls include sufficient and effective ventilation, possibly enhanced by particle filtration and air disinfection, avoiding air recirculation and avoiding overcrowding. Often, such measures can be easily implemented and without much cost, but if only they are recognised as significant in contributing to infection control goals. We believe that the use of engineering controls in public buildings, including hospitals, shops, offices, schools, kindergartens, libraries, restaurants, cruise ships, elevators, conference rooms or public transport, in parallel with effective application of other controls (including isolation and quarantine, social distancing and hand hygiene), would be an additional important measure globally to reduce the likelihood of transmission and thereby protect healthcare workers, patients and the general public.